Should we have seen it coming?

There are a number of important aspects to the Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly1, but the most surprising, and indeed radical, was undoubtedly the advent in English law of a doctrine of equivalents.

The possibility that courts might consider the prosecution history of a patent has been discussed on and off over the years. Indeed, Arnold J’s judgment in the first instance case appeared to open the door, at least a little, to some form of (the arguably linked) “file wrapper” estoppel. However, the continual rebuttal of the existence of a doctrine of equivalents in English law had been one of the most consistent aspects of the jurisprudence, certainly over the last 20 years. With this, apparently, was a rebuttal of any need for a form of file wrapper or “prosecution history” estoppel.

Actavis V Eli Lilly Should We Have Seen It Coming


The content of our website is updated regularly. Subscribe to our newsletter and stay on top of new developments. Your email address is safe and will not be shared with any third party.